James Baldwin in 1969. Photograph: Allan Warren CC BY-SA 3.0
One of the books I am currently reading is James Baldwin: The Cross of Redemption (Uncollected Writings), edited with an introduction by Randall Kenan and published in 2010. One of the essays in the collection, dated 1984 but still strikingly relevant, is “On Being White … and Other Lies.” A particular passage from that essay stood out to me:
“Just so does the white community, as a means of keeping itself white, elect, as they imagine, their political (!) representatives. No nation in the world, including England, is represented by so stunning a pantheon of the relentlessly mediocre. I will not name names—I will leave that to you.
But this cowardice, this necessity of justifying a totally false identity and of justifying what must be called a genocidal history, has placed everyone now living into the hands of the most ignorant and powerful people the world has ever seen. And how did they get that way? By deciding they were white. By opting for safety instead of life. By persuading themselves that a black child’s life meant nothing compared with a white child’s life. By abandoning their children to the things white men could buy. By informing their children that black women, black men, and black children had no human integrity that those who call themselves white were bound to respect. And in this debasement and definition of black people, they debased and defined themselves.” (The Cross of Redemption, pp. 168–169)
This passage struck me as just as relevant today as it was in Baldwin’s time. The language of racial division may sometimes be more coded—though often, it is not—but the underlying dynamics remain. Some now speak of a mythical golden age to be restored, painting diversity, equity, and inclusion as enemies to be vanquished. Yet Baldwin’s pantheon of the relentlessly mediocre remains firmly in place, with a growing number of elected officials – led by one in particular – who traffic in racial grievance and nostalgia for an edifice of the past that was built upon exclusion. The resentment they cultivate is growing more visceral, more vengeful by the day.
At its core, Baldwin’s essay is a reminder that race is a social construct—one created not out of noble ideals or science but out of moral rot. It was, and remains, a means of defining power and justifying subjugation. Today’s renewed emphasis on racial division in politics—whether explicit or coded—is no less morally bankrupt than in Baldwin’s time.
One of the most striking images from Montaigne’s Essays, which has lodged itself firmly in my mind, comes from his Apology for Raymond Sebond. Specifically, within one paragraph, he uses wheat as an extended metaphor or an allegory wherein he suggests that the more wisdom or knowledge one acquires, the more humble one becomes. He writes:
To really learned men has happened what happens to ears of wheat: they rise high and lofty, heads erect and proud, as long as they are empty; but when they are full and swollen with grain in their ripeness, they begin to grow humble and lower their horns. (Montaigne, 1963, p. 227)
The image captures what I have found to be my experience insofar as that, with each passing year, as my hair has silvered and my eyes dimmed, I have found that wisdom requires casting the certitude, rigidity, and knowledge of youth aside for the humility of lived experience.
Additionally, I find the lesson to be an extraordinary corollary to my personal motto, about which I have previously written, Humilitatem Initium Sapientiae (humility is the beginning of wisdom).
Thus, having reflected if not obsessed upon Montaigne’s insight for well over a fortnight, I finally shaped my thoughts about it into a poem, the results of which are below.
The Ripened Ear (Inspired by Montaigne)
Beneath the sun’s unyielding gaze, it grows, The tender stalk, upright and full of pride, Its hollow strength unbent by winds that blow, Yet void of fruit, it stands unsatisfied.
But time, the patient sower, bids it yield, To weight of grain within its swelling breast, It bows its head, as on the golden field, The burdened ear finds wisdom’s humble crest.
So too the soul, in ignorance, stands tall, Unbowed by truths it dares not yet to see, Until the harvest’s gentle weight does call, And bends the heart to find humility.
For wisdom ripens where humility’s sown, And humbleness, by wisdom, is full-grown.
Montaigne, M. de. (1963). Essays and selected writings: A bilingual edition (D. M. Frame, Trans. & Ed.). St. Martin’s Press.
I have completed a draft of a booklet, The Tales and Fables of Lysander Aesopides, exploring wisdom, morality, and the balance of light and shadow. Inspired by “Traditional Slovak Folktales,” I aim to reflect fable traditions and the human condition. Each tale is illustrated with carefully chosen artwork. Join me in exploring these fables, offering reflections and timeless lessons.
It is with some trepidation and absolute pleasure that I announce that I have completed a draft of a booklet, The Tales and Fables of Lysander Aesopides. This collection of fables, written under my chosen pseudonym, explores themes of wisdom, morality, and the intricate balance of light and shadow within the human experience. The name Lysander Aesopides—a blend of ‘Lysander,’ meaning ‘liberator’ or ‘one who is free,’ and ‘Aesopides,’ meaning ‘descendant of Aesop’—symbolizes a continuation of the ancient tradition of fable-telling, while also embracing a spirit of renewal and reinterpretation. Through this persona, I seek to honor the legacy of Aesop, while offering narratives that explore these timeless themes in ways that reflect the complexities of our modern world.
CLICK ABOVE IMAGE TO OPEN A DRAFT PDF BOOKLET OF THE ABOVE COLLECTION OF FABLESOR CLICK BUTTON AT END OF POSTING
The impetus for this work stems from my long appreciation for fables and folktales and the collection of such fables and tales in my library. The release of this draft coincides with the recent arrival of a cherished addition to my library—a volume entitled “Traditional Slovak Folktales”(Collected by Pavol Dobsinsky and edited and translated by David L. Cooper). The stories within, rich with cultural heritage and timeless lessons, inspired me to continue to craft my own set of tales that reflect both the universality of fable traditions and the unique nuances of our shared human condition.
You are invited to explore these fables and tales, where the old meets the new, and where every tale offers a reflection, a lesson, or perhaps even a glimpse into the complexities of our souls. This booklet will continue to grow over time. Also, I saw fit to illustrate each fable with a work of art that seemed fitting to the tale. In time, I suspect I will proffer more explanation within the publication as to why the artwork was chosen.
It is my hope that you find some pleasure in my efforts, as I certainly enjoyed the creation of these nuggets.
A video featuring contemporary lyrics written consistent with the theme of this post set to EDM style music created by Udio.com – a very different sort of exercise for me. I am especially pleased with the artwork selected to illustrate the video, “Collapse,” by Gao Xingjian (b. 1940).
Introduction
The erosion of civility and community values that once formed the bedrock of American society has been mirrored by the rise of politicians, judges, and business leaders who champion hyper-individualism, greed, and materialism under the guise of pseudo-American values. These values, far from being genuinely American, are more akin to the adolescent, poorly thought-out, morally bankrupt principles espoused by Ayn Rand. After witnessing several recent judicial decisions by unprincipled U.S. Supreme Court Justices, state court justices, and local judges, as well as unhinged remarks and rants by national, state, and local politicians and candidates, I was inspired to write the lyrics to “Echoes of Self” to critique these troubling trends and the philosophies that are leading us astray.
The Loss of Civility and Community
Historically, American values have been rooted in a sense of community, mutual respect, and collective responsibility. The concept of “we the people” signifies a collective identity and shared purpose. Granted, we as a nation started out poorly by excluding many people from our great promise based on color and sex, and have periodically excluded others based on national origin. But we have made great efforts to overcome these national deficiencies and to meet the American promise for all Americans.
However, in recent decades, and most especially in recent years, there has been a noticeable shift towards celebrating hyper-individualism and personal gain at the expense of community and civility. This shift is evident in the rhetoric of certain politicians and business leaders who glorify self-interest and material success while disregarding the broader societal impacts of their actions.
The Rise of Hyper-Individualism and Materialism
The ascension of figures like Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel epitomizes this new wave of hyper-individualism. These individuals, along with their enabling politicians, promote a worldview that prioritizes personal success and wealth accumulation over community welfare and ethical and moral considerations. This mindset is often cloaked in pseudo-American values, presenting themselves as champions of freedom and opportunity. In reality, these values are foreign to the traditional American ethos of shared responsibility and social cohesion. Feigned outrage over manufactured crises and boogeymen distracts from issues both real and critical to the health of the commonweal.
“Narcissistic, hear the screams”
The Influence of Ayn Rand’s Philosophy
The philosophy of Ayn Rand, particularly her emphasis on “rational self-interest” (the greed is good society) and minimal government, has played a significant role in shaping this new value system. Rand’s ideas, which celebrate the individual’s pursuit of their own happiness above all else, have found a resurgence among the billionaire class and their supporters. However, these ideas are fundamentally flawed and contrary to both traditional American values as well as Catholic social doctrine (which I mention as having been raised Catholic but find so many “conservative” American Catholic bishops and “believers” abandoning in the MAGA era). It has saddened me that even some Catholic friends have embraced Ms Rand’s adolescent, mis-guided philosophy of greed and self-interest.
Critique of Ayn Rand’s Philosophy
Ayn Rand’s Objectivism prioritizes individual achievement and self-interest, often at the expense of empathy and community. Here are key points of critique:
Lack of Empathy and Social Responsibility: Rand’s philosophy dismisses the importance of empathy and altruism, viewing them as weaknesses. In contrast, traditional American values and Catholic social doctrine emphasize the importance of caring for the less fortunate and fostering a sense of community.
Hyper-Individualism: Rand’s extreme individualism undermines the social fabric by promoting a “survival of the fittest” mentality. This is antithetical to the principles of solidarity and the common good that are central to Catholic teaching and the American democratic tradition.
Minimal Government: Rand’s advocacy for minimal government intervention fails to address systemic inequalities and the need for collective action to support the vulnerable. In contrast, both American civic values and Catholic social teaching recognize the role of government in promoting justice and protecting the rights of all citizens.
Economic Inequality: Rand’s acceptance of economic inequality as a natural outcome of individual differences ignores the structural barriers that prevent equal opportunity. Addressing these barriers through governmental policies is essential for a just society. It is clear from various economic analyses that income and wealth have become unconscionably concentrated in the hands of very few individuals. This cannot be explained by merit alone; the system has been rigged with billionaires essentially buying politicians who write laws that favor the extremely wealthy, allowing them to avoid taxes that others cannot.
Inspiration for “Echoes of the Self”
“Echoes of the Self” is a reflection of my deep concerns about American civil society. It was directly inspired by watching recent speeches of Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance, reading the words of Mr. Musk, reading about how Mr. Thiel financed the election of a U.S. senator from Ohio, and reading multiple recent judicial decisions where the words in statutes or constitutions were disregarded when judges had an ideological agenda to fulfill.
“I am the Chosen One!” – Donald J. Trump (Statement to the press on August 21, 2019)
Conclusion
Through “Echoes of Self,” I aim to highlight the dangers of adopting Ayn Rand’s philosophy as a guiding principle for our society. Perhaps as a society, we will find our way back to the values of civility, community, and shared responsibility, fostering a more compassionate and just society. And, perhaps, I will have time to produce a more interesting video to accompany this song, but for now, this will have to suffice.
Conveniences commonplace today were once novel. In this regard, today let us remember with gratitude Vincent of Beauvais, who died in 1264 AD, for making access to to the content of books easier. He is credited as having been the first writer to systematically provide indexes for his works, a trend which others eventually followed. He added an index to every single book of his Speculum historiale after 1244. This kind of apparatus only spread more widely in the field of historical writing during the fourteenth century, beginning with the Tabula secundum litterarum ordinem alphabeti on the same work by Vincent, composed by Jean Hautfuney in Avignon around 1320. Thank you, Vincent!
Source: Kujawiński, J. (2015). Commenting on historical writings in medieval Latin Europe: A reconnaissance. Acta Poloniae Historica, Volume 112, 169. Especially see footnote 26, which states the following: “See the study and edition by Monique Paulmier, ‘Jean Hautfuney, Tabula super Speculum historiale fratris Vincentii’, Spicae. Cahiers de l’Atelier Vincent de Beauvais, Nouvelle série, 2 (1980), 19–263 (on Vincent’s indexes, see 20–3), and ibidem, 3 (1981), 5–208. Both Vincent’s and Jean’s indexes are discussed within the history of medieval historiography by Guenée, Histoire et culture historique, 232–7, and within the history of medieval indexes by Olga Weijers, ‘Les index au Moyen Âge sont-ils un genre littéraire?’ in Leonardi, Morelli, Santi (eds.), Fabula in tabula, 11–22, here: 20–1, and il. 5.”
Northcoast Antiquarian 